Archive for the ‘Entertainment Industry’ Category

Outta My Face(book Movie)!

July 20th, 2010

The last time an internet-based phenomenon generated inspiration for a full length feature film was in 1998, when “You’ve Got Mail” capitalized on the popularity of AOL and our hearts. Just a bit over a decade later, Hollywood has gone back to a similar formula and looks to social networking giant, Facebook, for a box office hit! One thing that won’t be difficult for the new film: finding a way to market to a 400 million user fan base!

The information super highway is all a-buzz with glad tiding about The Facebook Movie (officially entitled The Social Network).  And what set the wires singing with praise for this upcoming Fincher/Sorkin work?  The release of the full-length trailer:

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

Sure, the a cappella choir Radiohead is cool (personally I have a soft-spot for The Brown Derbies’ version of “Karma Police”), but the only reason I believe everyone started feeling so darn jazzed about a movie on Zuckerberg is because all previous teasers were laughable.

Pensive teaser:

Chatty teaser:

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

Suddenly the teaser featuring booze, sex, and J Timbo isn’t looking so lame, right?

It also helps up the Twitter chatter when you invest in Twitter advertising.

Bottom line I’m a huge Sorkin fan and will probably give this movie a shot, but I just can’t help feeling like “this is the story of your generation” is being forced down my throat.  And with months until the film’s premier the marketers have got plenty of time to keep packing it in there.

-Topher

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Great TV on ABC? Yeah right! This summer it’s more like Dumb TV on DumbBC!

July 1st, 2010

Great TV on ABC?  Yeah right!  This summer it’s more like Dumb TV on DumbBC!

Doing their part for Big Brother (the shadowy figure, not the reality show), ABC is keeping the workingman stupid and sated with a Tuesday lineup of  “http://abc.go.com/shows/wipeout” Wipeout and  “http://abc.go.com/shows/downfall” Downfall.

Wipeout is America’s un-hilarious version of Japan’s hilarious  “http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5214388990912034244″ Most Extreme Elimination Challenge”, mixed with Japan’s also-hilarious “  “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sasuke_%28TV_series%29″ Ninja Warrior”.  It’s not awful because someone always gets hit in the face with something, but other than pratfalls the show’s not really good for anything, and the hosts remind me of   “http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE13irgtCQw” Ryan Stile’s two irritating slacker brothers.  The real schlock, however, shows up next in the rotation in the form of Downfall.

In a callous display of wasteful decadence unseen in a failing empire since Caligula’s Rome, Downfall is the American game show equivalent of a   “http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2421/were-there-really-vomitoriums-in-ancient-rome” vomitorium.  Contestants perch on the top of a tall building and respond to clues about a specific topic, while in front of them on a conveyor belt are they prizes they seek to win.  As the clock winds down, they prizes creep toward the edge of the building, and are one by one jettisoned to their ruin until the contestant answers enough questions right.  Perfectly good electronics and automobiles, all smashed to pieces to the delighted squeals of audiences of post-Roman plebeians.

The host is a pretty good pick, in ex-WWE wrestler Chris Jericho.  At least he doesn’t come off too smart for the show; in the premier episode, he mispronounces the name of one of President Obama’s daughters.

Now, I’m not one to whom hatred of ABC comes as a knee jerk.  There was a time when I’d happily opt for a Friday in, catching   “http://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/about-the-show” Shark Tank (the BEST!), watching wives get swapped, and cheering for nannies to save the day.  Not that these programs are the brain-food of Nobel laureates, but come on people!  Throwing prospective prizes off a roof?  Jeez!

Ultimately, it’s always up to you, and though there’s nothing morally wrong with tuning in to ABC on Tuesdays this summer, to those who do I ask this:
1) Aren’t we, as a culture, just BEGGING for it?
2) Why don’t you turn the television off, and download a nice podcast?    “http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/” Radiolab and  “http://www.thisamericanlife.org/” This American Life aren’t inappropriately taxing on the ol’ noggin’, and I think you’ll find you feel better after being spoken to like a being capable of thought.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Farmer Fabulous: An exploration of agrarian chic

June 16th, 2010

If the Odd Couple came out of the closet (finally!) and moved to a farm in upstate New York their show would be The Fabulous Beekman Boys.

The Fabulous Beekman Boys is the latest offering from Discovery’s fledgling channel Planet Green, and features the lives of Josh and Brent, two citified fellas who decide to follow in Eva Gabor’s footsteps and see if farm living really is the life for them.

Brent is a former VP of healthy living at Martha Stewart Omnimedia, Josh is a former drag queen, and if you don’t snicker at the thought of watching these two chase a runaway piglet then I don’t offer any hope for you as a person.  The boys have been together for ten years, and the show focuses on their crusade as a couple to push their farming concern on the Beekman Estate into a profitable venture (it also features plenty of good old fashioned barnyard slapstick).

Besides the vivid personalities of the two leading gentlemen, other stars are poised to emerge from TFBB, the first being Farmer John.  Burly papa-bear John brought his beloved herd of more than forty goats to Beekman, and has been turning out soap and cheese courtesy of these cloven hoofed companions ever since.  I’m calling it now: sensitive yet strong-and-silent Farmer John may very well have what it takes to be The New Gay Sex Symbol.

The other stand-out from the supporting cast is the farm’s llama Polka Spot.  “When this show gets going my life isn’t going to change, and Josh’s life isn’t going to change,” Brent observes, “but Polka Spot’s life has changed dramatically.”  Apparently the camera crews, when filming the show, were hard-pressed to keep this spotlight-crazed creature out of any shot they were setting up.  Now she even has her own twitter handle.  “Oh yeah,” agrees Josh, “she’s a real diva.” Takes one to know one!

What struck me the most about TFBB is that it’s very clearly a show about a couple doing a crazy thing together, rather than about a gay couple.  It’s a small distinction, but watching the Beekman boys’ antics and spats, it occurred to me that the show completely lacked that “Hey, these are gay guys, they’re whacky and bitchy, they’re in your face and faboo” vibe that really rubs me the wrong way with many other reality shows featuring gay people.

In the end, The Fabulous Beekman Boys is a reality show.  Thus there are a few awkwardly staged moments and some situations where you can just feel the producer behind the scenes, but I say blame it on the genre.  At the conclusion of the second episode Josh and Brent hunker down on their porch steps to share some private time and some pizza after a crazy day.  Their gentle chatter, though fairly innocuous, radiated a comfort and warmth that is the natural product of a loving relationship.  Sure, reality tv’s all about train wrecks, but it’s glimpses of a connection like the one Brent and Josh share that keep me coming back to a show.

May the coming season (both agricultural and television) be fruitful for these fabulous Beekman boys.

-Topher

http://topherburns.tumblr.com/archive

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

“TV’s Pseudo Summer Sizzle”

June 15th, 2010

“TV’s Pseudo Summer Sizzle”

It’s that time of year again.  Our beloved fall shows come to an end and the networks gear up for their always mediocre summer TV lineup.  The final end to LOST, and almost losing Law & Order made Spring so bittersweet so lets cross our fingers and see what we have in store for 2010.

There will be at least three new cop shows this summer, including ABC’s newest installment, “Rookie Blue” which seems to be all too similar to “Grey’s Anatomy” with cops- maybe (hopefully) without the Lillith Fair soundtrack.   Also this summer is Fox’s new buddy-cop show, “The Good Guys” which my roommate informs me is good- he doesn’t have the best taste, but I can’t really say no to Bradley Whitford in a mustache.

Also riding strong this summer is Bravo’s always predictably entertaining reality show lineup.  The cable channel that has brought us such gems as “The Real Housewives’ series” (we’ll finish off the New Jersey gals this summer) and other classics is bringing the big guns this summer, with the new season of “Top Chef: DC” & “Kathy Griffin: My Life on the D List” and premiers of Sarah Jessica Parker produced “Work of Art: The Next Great Artist,” & “Bethenny Getting Married?”  However, the latter I may skip all together (too much Housewives, is not really a good thing)

And lets not forget about our friends over at MTV.  We’re mid-season of “The Hills” and “The City” and are slowly approaching another onset of GTL and “Juicers” in season 2 of Jersey Shore.  Yes, the good ole Jersey Shore is back with our favorite characters: Snooki, J-WOWW, Pauly D, & the Situation (there are more, but they aren’t really worth mentioning) and they are all taking South Beach by storm.  I’m excited, and slightly nervous about this new season, I just hope our beloved cast personalities remain pure, tan and don’t become too contrived…

Another interesting note on the MTV front is their turn towards scripted comedies.  Maybe after the somewhat downfall of “the Hills” post Lauren Conrad and pre Speidi’s bizarro breakdown they have decided to turn to professional actors rather than manipulating emotionally unstable pseudo-celebrities.  Anyway- this summer brace yourself for “the Hard Times of R.J, Berger” about a well-endowed, somewhat awkward teenager, and  “Warren the Ape” – a fictional reality show about a D-list celebrity puppet (fingers crossed for Hills/City jokes!!!)

With all the new material coming out this summer, it’s important not to forget about our classic favorites.  True Blood returns for it’s third season this summer (yayy!) and hopefully we get to see more Eric. Some have criticized TB for having too many major characters, which I agree with- however, US Weekly has recently reported that there’s a big death on the horizon- so brace yourselves TB fans and let’s hope it’s not someone we really like.

Also this summer is Season 4 of Mad Men, in which we get to see where everybody’s favorite ad man, Don Draper takes his renegade break-off agency.  However, reports have said that this season will focus on the drama occurring on the home front and less at the office (not quite sure how I feel about that yet- I guess we’ll have to wait until July 25th.)

Finally, we’ll end with everyone’s favorite pot-dealing suburban milf, Nancy Botwin.  Weeds has been airing for 5 seasons now and things definitely turned weird in the last two (especially season 5) with the family moving close to the boarder and Nancy marrying a sketchball Mexican drug lord/politician.  The show has derailed some but if you have been watching for this long (which I have) you’d be a fool not to turn into Season 6 and see what will happen in the aftermath of (SPOILER ALERT!) youngest Botwin- Shane’s homicidal act against Nancy’s husband’s right-hand woman- Pilar.  Stay tuned!

There you have it- a C grade review of mostly (with few exceptions) C grade television.  I don’t know about you but personally I love watching TV in the summer time- especially on those hot, hot summer nights when I prefer to skip the humidity and stay indoors. I just wish the networks understood this and could give us some more quality goods- I’m just sayin’….
-Arielle

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Give Contemplation Unto the New Oprah

June 2nd, 2010

That which is Oprah, the summation of existences and contradictions that comprise one universal being, is far beyond my comprehension.  The many forms of this cosmic conglomerate have but one face, though, and this face smiles upon humanity.

In its inscrutable wisdom the Oprah has chosen to replicate itself one-hundredfold and to populate a cable network entitled OWN.  In my limited ability to conceptualize of the nature of Oprah, I often turn to New York Magazine, which does a pretty darn good job.  Limited though my own powers may be, this much is certain: the Oprah has requested we collect ourselves and report, via video submission, to be Judged.

That’s right!  Oprah’s plum out of ideas, and asking all of us – “Well, I dunno, what do you think?”  Her search for the next TV star has begun in earnest.

Now we all know that humankind as it is today can be divided into two simple groups: those who have heard of Oprah and “don’t care” and those who have heard of Oprah and “CARE!”  I myself subscribe mostly to the former, and my old college buddy Daniel to the latter.  Which is how I found out about this contest in the first place.  In his bid to become Oprah’s next TV star, he has become the momentary star of my Facebook wall.

With so many friends liking and reposting his audition video, I called Daniel to get the scoop.  To be honest, he’s got my vote – he’s enthusiastic, positive, smart, and cute as a button.  Oprah’d be lucky to have him.  His idea, “Energize America”, is a cagey one considering OWN’s focus, but it’s also something he’s obviously very passionate about.  Judge for yourself by checking out his video on the site, or by visiting his YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/danielundeniable), which I’m told will be updated regularly with more happy hellos and “Energize” concepts.

What struck me after chatting with Daniel is the warp-tunnel represented in this process between TV-then and TV-now.  Back in the day, Oprah clawed her way through incredible obstacles on the long tortuous ladder to become what she is today.  Now the Empress Multi-Media smiles down upon all of us wannabes and says “Come join me,” and we all think it’s the most natural thing in the world.

Should Daniel be the next network star?  I think so!  It just makes me wonder, though, as his votes tick higher and his Facebook status updates cartwheel their way through my network of friends: if the hierarchical and dictatorial media landscape of the past gave rise to the present all-Oprah pantheon, what sort of cosmos will the Daniels of the future inhabit?

- Topher Burns

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

2010 Summer Movie preview…

May 13th, 2010

After the release of Iron Man 2 last Friday, it is safe to say that it’s once again time for a summer of blockbuster movies. I must say, as a regular moviegoer, I’m more excited about the overall list of films the summer of 2010 has to offer than I have been during previous summer movie seasons. From chick flicks, to superheroes, to comedies, to computer animated films; this summer has something for everyone. Popular franchises from the past are being dusted off and shoved onto the silver screen, and one can’t help but be intrigued by the characters invading theaters this summer. So grab your popcorn, wipe down your 3-D glasses, because this movie season looks to be pretty epic (well at least on paper).

Here is a link to the ‘ultimate movie preview for summer 2010’ mash-up, that is sure to get audiences excited about what is coming to a theater near you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Cc_KMPFxqE .

Must See Movies for the Summer Season

1.  The A-Team: the American action based television program that rocked the 1980’s has become one of the most hyped films of this summer season. The remake will feature Bradley Cooper, Liam Neeson, Jessica Biel, Patrick Wilson, Quinton ‘Rampage’ Jackson, and Sharlto Copley and barrels into theaters June 11th.

2.  The Last Airbender: director M. Night Shyamalan makes his return to the big screen with his adaptation of Nickelodeon’s animated series. Dev Patel, Aasif Mandvi, Jackson Rathbone help round out the cast, as the movie kicks off in theaters July 2nd.

3.  Sex and The City 2: although I probably won’t be seeing this one, the gigantic fan base of Manhattan’s most popular foursome lands this film on my ‘must see’ list. Sarah Jessica Parker, Kristin Davis, Cynthia Nixon, and Kim Cattrall look to satisfy their loyal fans as the girls leave Manhattan to explore Dubai. Sex and the City 2 is set to strut into theaters May 27th.

4.  MacGruber: After years of waiting, finally another SNL skit lands on the big screen, and if you are familiar with other SNL productions; you should also be expecting big laughs. MacGruber is a sketch that takes form as a parody of the 1985 TV hit MacGyver. Will Forte, Ryan Phillippe, Maya Rudolph, Kristen Wiig, and Val Kilmer represent the core of the cast of the SNL inspired film. MacGruber and company explode into theaters May 21st.

5.  Shrek Forever After: Dreamworks preps for the 4th and final installment of it’s most popular character Shrek this summer. The lovable green ogre is joined by his usual band of characters featuring the voices of: Mike Meyers, Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy, Antonio Banderas, John Cleese, Julie Andrews, and Kathy Griffin. A land far, far, away looks to land in theaters on May 21st.

6.  Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time: Disney and Mike Newell team up for an epic desert adventure based on the popular video game franchise, Prince of Persia. The action packed adventure stars Jake Gyllenhaal, Alfred Molina, and Ben Kingsley. The movie is set to be released May 28th.

7.  Inception: The director of the highly acclaimed Dark Knight, looks to extend his summer success by teaming up with Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen Page, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt in this futuristic thriller. Fans can expect Nolan to deliver with mind numbing special effects and a plot that keeps you at the edge of your seat. Inception is set to invade theaters July 16th.

8.  Scott Pilgrim vs The World: In this comedy, audiences join Scott Pilgrim on his battle to destroy his girlfriends 7 ex’s in order to win her heart. Michael Cera, Jason Schwartzman, Kieran Culkin, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Anna Kendrick collaborate to deliver an epic and violent comedy about psycho ex’s. Scott Pilgrim vs The World fights its way into theaters August 13th.

-Aaron

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart: Television’s New Star Machine

April 29th, 2010

Remember those days when virtually any featured actor on SNL was automatically propelled into superstardom? Well those days are over and there is a new comedy variety show that serves as a modern day star machine, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Since Stewart took over the show from Craig Kilborn in January of 1999, the late night talk show has skyrocketed in popularity, and solidified a spot amongst one of Comedy Central’s most successful programs. Over the shows tenure, many of the show’s correspondents have gone on to become household names, and have the Daily Show to thank for providing the ideal platform to leap into the Hollywood limelight. The last several years has been huge for the illustrious alumni of The Daily Show and after seeing Steve Carrell gearing up for his new movies, ‘Date Night’ and ‘Dinner for Schmucks’, I felt it was time to breakdown all of the successes of his fellow alums as well.

1.  Steve Carrell: Appeared on show from 1999-2004. Notable Projects: The 40 Year Old Virgin, Anchorman, Little Miss Sunshine, Evan Almighty, Dan in Real Life, Get Smart, Date Night, Over the Hedge, Horton Hears A Who. Carrell was also received a Golden Globe in 2006 for Best Male Actor in a Comedy Series.

2.  Stephen Colbert: Appeared on show from 1999-2005. Notable Projects: The Dana Carvey Show, Bewitched, Monsters vs Aliens, Strangers with Candy, The Colbert Report, I am America (and so can you) *# 1 on New York Times Bestsellers List. Colbert has received three Emmy nominations, performed at the White House Correspondents Dinner in 2006, and named to Time magazine’s  list of the 100 most influential people in 2006.

3. Ed Helms: Appeared on show from 2002-2006. Notable Projects: The Hangover, The  Office, Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story, Evan Almighty, The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard, Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian, Monsters Vs Aliens, The Hangover 2*, Jeff Who lives at home*.

4. Demetri Martin: Appeared on show 2004- present. Notable Projects: Analyze That, The Rocker, Taking Woodstock, Important Things with Demetri Martin, Late Night with Conan O’Brien.

5. Lewis Black: Appeared on show 1999-present. Notable Projects: Red, White, and Screwed, Black on Broadway, Farce of the Penguins, Man of the Year, Unaccompanied Minors, Accepted, The Root of All Evil, The Big Bang Theory.

6. Rob Riggle: Appeared on show from 2006-2008. Notable Projects: The Hangover, Step Brothers, The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard, Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby, Killers*, The Other Guys*, Going the Distance*.

-Aaron Thorburn

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

PR and Hip-Hop Go Together Like PB&J

April 15th, 2010

Public Relations is a component that is applicable to a wide range of businesses, or any other entity that requires media or public exposure in some way. However, some PR tactics are so well executed, that many outside of the ‘out-group’ may follow suit with exactly what PR practitioners had in mind when producing their respected campaigns. By now I suppose you’re wondering exactly what campaigns I’m alluding to. Well look no further than the hip-hop industry, and the way the artists are packaged for mass consumption. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that a majority of rappers’ personas are exaggerated, depicting wild lifestyles riddled with fame, fortune, violence, and drugs. When in retrospect, these tales of taboo are really utilized as marketing tools, capturing the attention of a worldwide audience.

Now the relationship between PR and rappers is undeniable, money hungry record executives understand the correlation between selling records and ‘street cred’. Thus publicizing their artists’ wild lifestyles and constructing an image or brand. Executives keep trying these tactics, and mix and match attributes until they find the winning formula. By choosing to exploit certain events in their artists’ past, while steering attention away from other events, they consciously build an image that could translate into record sales.  Don’t believe me? Well here is a breakdown of some of the personas hip-hop has to offer:

1.  The Drug Dealer: this category of rappers is the one I find most amusing. While certain rappers such as Jay-Z and others admit to participating in the selling of illegal substances in their past, some rappers insist on talking about drug trafficking as a current stream for income. Atlanta rapper, Young Jeezy, has made a career through telling audiences tales of his ‘dark past’, and even became a Grammy Award winning artist. A large group of rappers find themselves in this category, since selling drugs has been a winning formula in hip-hop since the industry first hit the mainstream, executives know that utilizing this image will create a buzz, and give their client credibility.

2.   The Pimp: from Slick Rick to Too Short, audiences around the world now know that “pimping ain’t easy”. Misogyny and rap go together like peanut butter and jelly, so it wasn’t really a surprise that executives began using pimps as a part of their formula to success. The rappers in this category boast about sexual escapades, and the control they have over certain women, appealing to hip-hop’s prime demographic of young adult and teenage males.

3.  Living the Life: if one were to view the music videos of these rappers, one would conclude that they are pretty wealthy. From “making it rain” in the club, to flying on private G4s, these videos depict the artists as all living flashy lifestyles; lifestyles that the average joe could only dream of. But are the depictions accurate? Not entirely, an elite group of artists enjoy the finer things in life, while others are caught up in record deals that grant record executives more cash incentives than the artists. Although they are still making good money, the idea that these individuals live such flashy lives is exaggerated and in some cases a facade. However the image they are constructing is a winning formula and circles back to the idea that the ‘average joe’ couldn’t even imagine these riches, while playing off our innate desire to acquire wealth as both Western capitalists and human-beings.

4.  Thugs and Gangs: through establishing artists as gangsters leads to automatic street credibility, and is by far the most popular formula used by artists and executives. Before Shady Records/Aftermath released 50 Cent’s debut album, “Get Rich or Die Trying”, every hip-hop fan worldwide knew that the NY native had been shot 9 times prior to his rise in popularity. Do you think that information was leaked to the public by accident? No way! Before LA native, The Game, exploded onto the mainstream scene, fans were aware of his affiliation with Los Angeles gangs and his own personal misfortunes as a result of violence. Both of these artists are prime examples of building an artists image via violence and gang activity and both have enjoyed great levels of success as a result.    50 Cent has gone platinum multiple times on multiple albums, and is estimated to be worth $500-700 million according to a Forbes article.

5.  Conflict: People love conflict and drama, which is why this is an obvious formula for marketing purposes. Which is why when two high profile artists settle their differences on their albums, it leads to more sales. From Tupac and Biggie, to East side vs West side, executives sat back and watched their artist albums fly off the shelves and didn’t have to spend money on promotion since the conflict was doing the work for them.

Each formula reflects a certain aspect of living in an urban environment, which legitimizes the artists’ participation in an art form that was born in that very same urban environment. PR and branding play an essential role to rappers for these very reasons, and allows audiences who may not be exposed to such environments get a glimpse into the lives of those that have. Hence the importance of going beyond the music, and utilizing PR tactics to establish a certain image that’s desirable to the masses.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Is 3-D Revolutionary or an Over-hyped Gimmick?

April 8th, 2010

Call me old fashioned, but the recent overhaul of 3-D propaganda has left me not excited, but instead upset. The sanctity of the ‘movie going experience’ is being compromised to see images pop off the screen (yes, it sounds pretty lame–but technically that’s all it is), and I will not stand by and watch quietly!

I know what you’re probably thinking, and yes I did see ‘Avatar’ in 3-D, and I also enjoy my Pixar films in 3-D too. However, my personal vendetta towards 3-D hadn’t surfaced until I saw Tim Burton’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Prior to that film, the films that I had seen featuring the three dimensional technology were highly anticipated films that lived up to the hype and then some. But after Tim Burton’s remake of the classic Disney film, I began to think to myself, “if they are going to put this crap in 3-D and IMAX, then where does it end?”

Hollywood is churning out these films to create buzz and bring Americans back to theaters, but what if this formula works? It is a dangerous slippery slope, and could lead to a variety of catastrophic scenarios for the traditional moviegoer like myself.  Below I have created a list to put my argument into context:

1.  Aren’t we in a recession? The movies can be tough on your wallet as is, but if you thought paying $12.50 was steep, add 3-D and you’re paying $17.50 per ticket. Soon a trip to the movies will rival that of sitting in the bleacher seats at a professional sporting event!! And don’t even let me get started on the price of concessions…

2. Getting 3-D Happy? If this formula proves successful, what Hollywood studio executive won’t want a slice of the ‘3-D pie’? Next thing I know my girlfriend is going to be dragging me to the movie theater to see ‘Step It Up 3’ in 3-D (I wish I was witty enough to make this a joke, but unfortunately the barely anticipated sequel is set to ‘bust a move’ to a theater near you this summer)

3.   2-D to 3-D Conversions? Although many movies are released in 3-D, movies like the recently released “Clash of the Titans” were not originally shot in 3-D, thus falling a bit flat cinematically for those expecting the same epic “Avatar-esque feel”. Don’t take my word for it, here is what some of the more prestigious film critics had to say:

-The New York Times’ Manohla Dargis wrote, “The 3D in the ‘Clash of the Titans’ remake, which was added after it was shot, has none of the immersive quality of ‘Avatar’ and instead segments the image into discrete planes, bringing to mind the unintegrated levels of a pop-up book.”

-Said Roger Ebert, a 3D skeptic: “One word of consumer advice: Explain to kids that the movie was not filmed in 3D and is only being shown in 3D in order to charge you an extra $5 a ticket. I saw it in 2D, and let me tell you, it looked terrific.”

4. Sacrificing Artistic Value and Substance for Flashiness? Filmmaking genius, Tim Burton and his Director of Photography Dariusz Wolski for “Alice In Wonderland” opted to shoot the movie in 2D and convert it to 3D after, to maximize creative flexibility. It is re-assuring to see filmmakers opting on the side of creativity, but that also takes away from the overall quality of the 3D experience, but Disney won’t tell you that!!

5. The Moviegoing experience? It’s one thing to go to a theme park and watch a 15-minute attraction in 3D with all of the other sensory gadgets they contain; but a 2- hour feature film may be a bit much. In my experience, there are always a handful of the idiots in the theater who refuse to grasp the concept of 3D, and spend 3/4 of the film pretending to reach for objects (and all of these ‘idiots’ I refer to were ages 14 and up, which unfortunately signifies the quality of our public school system–but I digress). And I’m guessing the movie industry didn’t loop Lenscrafters in this equation, because wearing the dumpy 3-D glasses for multiple hours is an adventure in itself. Seriously though, I bet Benjamin Franklin’s bifocals were probably less awkward. Word to the wise: if you are on a first date, absolutely nothing about these glasses say ‘sex appeal’. These glasses would even reduce Tom Cruise to resembling Corey Haim’s character in the 1986 film, Lucas. And for all of the people out there that are more conscious about germs, well the thought of wearing these glasses could make you cringe. Upon receiving my glasses for a 3D movie, the viewer before me was gracious enough to leave remnants from what appeared to be a spilled soda on my lenses (I spill as much as the next person, but how do you manage that one on accident).

-Aaron Thorburn

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Channeling Idol’s Season 9 for Business Tips? Ish don’t think so….

April 6th, 2010

Recently I read an article that was sent to me via a business wire about how to improve your business by taking tips from American Idol, and well…

Let’s start from the beginning shall we?  The author initially states that after taking a few years off, he returns to realize why AI still reins as America’s number 1 show.  While the show may still be #1, the current season actually boasts the least amount of viewers in the show’s nine-year history.  Now if we are talking business models here…aren’t companies supposed to grow and in turn, increase profits?  How is losing viewers any indication of a thriving business?  Right here in the author’s first paragraph his entire argument is made into a moot point…AI’s failing business model actually has NOTHING to teach “we entrepreneurs”.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I am not an entrepreneur in the slightest, but I do consider myself a bit of a television connoisseur and a competent and well-reasoned individual, and in my first season of Idol viewing, I have to say I am a little underwhelmed. If it weren’t for my DVR I really don’t think I could get through the first half of even the first hour of the show.

Anyway…moving on…He goes on to express how “fun to watch” “entertaining” and “well done” the show is…Well, my apologies sir, but I have to strongly disagree with you and here is why:

Let’s get to crux of this argument shall we? Our author “Steve” begs entrepreneurs to consider the following:

“Deliver on your promise: American Idol knows what its job is. The promise of the show is this: Give us an hour and we will entertain you.”

Well Steve, I hate to break it you to but we have to give American Idol TWO hours to entertain us, and I would say that, placing all the meaningless jabberwocky aside, those two hours are filled with probably 20 minutes of solid entertainment.  Honestly, it takes 12 people 2+ hours to sing songs that are cut to less than a minute long.  My advice would be to deliver on your promise, but please don’t waste my time.

Also important to note…if we are considering a television show a business, and the show’s product the entertainment it promises…what television show doesn’t have the promise of entertainment?  If we are looking for a good example of a show that delivers on its promise…what about LOST?  I can barely answer a text message during that hour-long show without missing some unforeseen death or time warp…and even after the show has ended, I felt like it was merely 5 minutes ago that I tuned in…

Tweak – around the edges. By… bringing in a fourth judge seemed to be a change for the better.

Again, tweaking around the edges may work for small businesses- but in the case of Idol; I’d have to say that brining on Ellen was probably more of a mistake than a “nice change.”  If you are going to tweak around the edges, make sure the tweaks are actually benefitting your company.  Ellen’s contributions to the judge’s commentary rarely hold any merit and they have cut her time for commentary practically in half.

And to drive the point home that nearly every ”teaching point” in this article need not be made…what facet of life doesn’t benefit from a little tweaking?  Why was Botox invented?  Why do we have amendments to the constitution?  Why does McDonalds come out with a new menu item nearly every week?

Don’t mess with success: American Idol…has found a formula that works and they are riding it as far and as long as they can.

This statement holds true- they have found a formula.  But isn’t this “formula” just an overly produced and heavily sponsored version of Star Search?  Aside from Simon’s quick quips- all AI has done has capitalized on the American Dream and exploited those brave enough to do so.

Get rid of the deadwood: Not only did bringing in Ellen for Paula liven up the show.

I don’t know about you, but I miss Paula- in all her crazy glory.  Don’t get me wrong, I love Ellen but her knowledge on music is limited to say the least.  Her commentary, albeit humorous (in true Ellen fashion) falls short of true constructive criticism, and sometimes I cringe while watching, picking up on the fact that even Ellen knows she’s a little out of place. As far as “getting rid of the deadwood” make sure you don’t replace deadwood for additional deadwood, which may in fact be dead-er.

Have good partners: For these partners, the co-branding opportunity is amazing, and for the show, the co-branding opportunity is amazing. Everyone wins and everyone gains.

Yes, American Idol has great sponsors.  Sponsors so great that sometimes I think I’m watching an actual Coca-Cola commercial, and not a singing contest.  During contestant interviews I can barely even make-out Seacrest’s small frame amidst the interchanging of bright red and white Coke bottles with logos flashing everywhere.  It is important to have good sponsors and good partners but you don’t want to reach a point where these sponsors or partners can potentially override your core message.  American Idol has been repeatedly criticized for being too sponsor heavy, and sometimes it can take away from the things that actually make the show great: talented artists competing for their dreams, and of course our beloved Simon.

I do understand where our writer is coming from.  American Idol is a television machine that has proved itself with outstanding ratings and an unbelievable following. However, with Simon Cowell’s impending departure, and ratings being the worst they have been in the show’s history- as far as generating tips for entrepreneurs goes, it is in my humble opinion to perhaps- look elsewhere.

-Arielle

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon