Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

An Intro to Cocktails and Socializing: An Excerpt from “DON’T”

November 14th, 2011

The following is an excerpt from Marco Larsen’s critically acclaimed book “DON’T: The Essential Guide to Publicity in New York City”. In this post he gives an introduction to the do’s and don’ts of cocktail etiquette.

********************

According to the Encyclopedia of New York City, the island’s original, Native American inhabitants affectionately referred to it as manahachtanienk, meaning “general state of inebriation”. Whether they meant themselves or their new, Dutch neighbors over on what we now call Broadway is…hazy in retrospect.

No surprise then that Wall Street was named for a rampart that the more virtuous 17th century citizens of New Amsterdam erected partly to stem the tide of soused English colonists and other stray flotsam attracted by the abundance of pubs in the area. True to its beginnings, New York City to this day boasts more watering holes per block than any other city in the world.

In true form, business, and any other activity, in New York, often involves imbibing. A world-class city filled with world-class drinkers, it’s an intoxicating metropolis in many ways. On the vanguard of everything, commerce to cocktails, in the de facto cultural center of America even its signature cocktail is loaded—with history.

The Manhattan is named after the Manhattan Club, a bastion of upper crust Democrats, and mixed for Samuel J. Tilden, elected Governor of New York in 1874. A presidential hopeful, Tilden was later embroiled in the 19th Century’s greatest election scandal when he won the popular vote against Republican Rutherford B. Hayes, but was denied the White House based on crafty ballot counting in Florida (sound familiar?).

Fifty years later, when Prohibition reformers straightjacketed America for over a decade, New York responded by debuting 100,000 speakeasies. As the city’s patron saint, Frank Sinatra once put it, “I feel sorry for people who don’t drink. When they wake up in the morning, that’s as good as they’re going to feel all day.”

Which is more or less, how New Yorkers feel. Moreover, publicity is a profession intricately entwined with fashion, media, and entertainment, and excepting the financial industry, exceeded only by those three fields, in a race to the nearest bar for business meetings and professional events.

The list is long — the messy drunk, the maudlin drunk, the bitter drunk, the overly gregarious drunk, the sleazy drunk, the blabbermouth drunk—and you don’t want on it. If you’ve had any problems in the past managing alcohol’s effects, deal with that before starting in business here.

In New York, more so than other cities, it can be difficult to distinguish between a night on the town cutting loose with friends and one forging bonds with professional associates. For those in marketing and public relations, the distinction is worth nothing. Moreover, in a city where functioning alcoholics and social critics routinely overlap, how and what you drink will classify you. Use this to your advantage. Or at least avoid neglecting it to your detriment.

– By Marco Larsen

Stay tuned for more advice on socializing and cocktails in my next post “DON’T Order Vile Hooch”.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Christmas in October

October 31st, 2011

by Kedzie Schotters

Is it just me, or has Halloween gotten a little out of hand?

Every television show has a special; every product has a horror-themed ad, and every celebrity is hosting or attending a spooky soiree (see Heidi Klum above).

Don’t get me wrong—I love watching Al Roker prance around as Superman just as much as the next person. But what makes us so obsessed with Halloween? It doesn’t have the food of Thanksgiving, or the presents of Christmas.

I guess it has to be the costumes. Crazy, gory, over-the-top costumes that no one in their right mind would wear on any other day of the year. And that’s exactly what makes Halloween so much fun to celebrate year after year. But lately, Halloween has had a little transformation of its own, from .

First there’s the advertising. Halloween is essentially an advertiser’s excuse to start talking about Christmas—the Holy Grail of holidays—in October. It kicks off the holiday season, and as such, everyone participates, regardless of how irrelevant it is for their brand. For example, Best Buy insists that this Halloween, what we really need is a new computer because how else are we going to create all of the horror films that so many of us have been working on lately? Though this commercial is obviously only relevant to some, the main goal is to get people thinking about Best Buy in preparation for holiday shopping.

Secondly, today’s costumes are becoming excessive, in both clever unfortunate ways. The evolution of costumes from pumpkins, princesses, and puppies to sexy pumpkins, sexy princesses, and sexy puppies is an acceptable reality for adults. But now, that line between children’s and adult’s costumes has blurred. Kids’ skirts are just as short, just as tight, and just as inappropriate. If at all possible, I’d like to avoid seeing a sexy Dora the Explorer this year.

But, there’s another selection of costumes this Halloween that I actually applaud. They stem from our constantly evolving technology and prove imagination and creativity aren’t quite dead. One clever man used 2 FaceTiming iPads to make it appear as though he had a hole in his stomach. This is creative and absolutely brilliant. But for us geeks who don’t happen to have two iPads lying around, the most popular costumes this year are characters from Angry Birds, the most in demand iPhone gaming app. These costumes prove that media, more than ever, is playing a role in Halloween and it’s going to continue to be this way.

All in all, Halloween will always be a time to celebrate, and I suppose wearing a ridiculous ensemble is just part of the process. So here’s to wishing everyone a happy, healthy, and Snooki-free Halloween. Tomorrow you’ll be inundated with recipes for Thanksgiving, all while trying to get Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” out of your head.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Can You Hear Me Now? Good.

October 3rd, 2011

If you live or travel along Manhattan’s West Side, you have surely noticed a few extra bars on your cell phone in the subway stations. Last week, six subway stations in western Manhattan were outfitted with cell service, allowing T-mobile and AT&T customers to text, email, and call away. While many found it welcoming, many more are taking to Twitter, Facebook, Blogs, and other websites to rant about the newly extinct silence in the subways.

Constant complaints like, “It’s the end of an era!”, “How can they do this?”, and “Where will I go to escape the chatter?” have turned this technological development into a ridiculous event of catastrophic proportions. People even claim the subway was the only escape in New York from the blaring rings and constant electronic chimes (did something happen to Central Park?).

As a person who works in PR and likes to be available and connected throughout the day, these comments made me question how something so apparently positive could warrant so many unnecessarily negative responses. In a world accustomed to social media and constant connection, these complaints seemed unfitting and without merit. Communication keeps us linked, whether it be in an office, walking along the street, or waiting on a platform for a train. In today’s world, companies survive and thrive because their employees are always accessible. This is New York, and our connectivity has become an intrinsic part of our lifestyle. And for those fearful of Chatty Kathies, you can breathe a sigh of relief. We’re in the age of texting and emails– short and to the point. Few people will risk having their conversations cut short by the sounds of the incoming train.

Similarly, our time is valuable and timing is of the utmost importance in the world of social media. So if people can use their time being productive instead of feeling anxious about a late train, everyone is better off. You’ll have plenty of time to people watch and relax when the doors close and you zoom away, since service is limited to the platforms, not the tunnels.

With all of the positives, I still wonder why this service is experiencing such a harsh welcome. This new connectivity could decrease commuter stress, save innocent victims from violent crimes, and finally bring New York up to speed with cities like Boston and San Francisco who already have this technology.

Or, if you’re a doomsayer, it could plunge our world into a sinister chaos devoid of human interaction, tranquility, and meaning.

But you’ll have to let me know. I’m actually one of the lucky few who gets to walk to work, so I sort of avoid this whole subway issue.

So give me a call the next time you’re waiting for the A train. Or maybe just text me, because I’m not going to be able to hear a word you’re saying over those train screeches.

–Kedzie

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

#FBPlacesRulz versus #FBPlacesFail

September 3rd, 2010

Social media is everywhere around us, and recent studies show that Americans are spending a large percentage of their computer time utilizing social networking. With the growing popularity of social media, users have become accustomed to certain tools and features. From Twitter to YouTube, and even MySpace change is not always a good thing.  Adjusting the platform to the taste of it’s loyal users could be a nearly impossible task. Some ideas sore in popularity, while others epically fail, what do you think about Facebook places?

Facebook launched its location-based feature on August 19th, and so far I still don’t know a single soul who’s used it.

Given the nature of Facebook and keeping in mind past brouhahas about changes in the social networking service, I thought  Gawker.com’s first reaction was the most appropriate – “The First Thing You Should Do With Facebook Places: Don’t Let Other People Tag You”.  I’m not saying FB is evil, but just that when they launch new features it makes sense to get a quick handle on how to control information about you.

Like many others, I rushed to shut off what I thought would become a flood of pernicious reports linking me to various unsavory New York establishments at inappropriate hours of the night (all of which would be truthful of course, just not fit for my mother to see, and she joined a couple months ago.  We’re friends).

Instead, though, I haven’t seen a single trickle.  It seems as though everyone has adopted a similar view on the subject: “I might be willing to do this thing you suggest, Facebook, but first I’ll need to see if anyone else has taken you up on it.”  Either that or a slightly less engaged reaction like “Facebook Places?” or “Face Book… ???”  Regardless, I’m just not seeing people using the service.

I’ve posted a few inquiries on my ‘book page, and didn’t get anyone who fessed up to using the service, or even had anything positive to say.  Most of the friends who responded listed that their main objection was that they felt it to be too intrusive.  I can see where they’re coming from – location-based social media services definitely feel strange when you start using them.

Being an inveterate fan of Foursquare, though, the reasons I’m not switching over are different.  I like Foursquare – I’ve got a nice closed community of friends who I’m interested to see where they’re hanging out, and to whom I’m interested in bragging about my exploits about time.

One main reason I’m not excited to pull the geo-location stuff into my Facebook life is that Facebook really IS my whole life – it’s pretty much everyone I’ve been friendly with since I got on the service in college, and now even family (see: Mom).  These add up to hundreds of people I don’t want to have to sort into to “share my location” and “don’t share my location” subgroups.  Annoying!

Finally, Facebook just hasn’t made the case to me as to why I should use Places.  Whereas Foursquare is an exciting, young, fresh new thing to try (have you used weeplaces to get a visualization of your checkins?  So cool!), Places feels like something FB is trying to make me do.  “You WILL integrate The Facebook into every aspect of your life, users!”  Zuckerberg’s getting a little too pushy for my taste.

-Topher
So what do you think?  Let us know on our Twitter account http://www.twitter.com/publicnyc @publicnyc).  If you totally <3 FB Places, we’d love to hear why (#FBPlacesRulz).  If you think it’s the new Google Wave, direct your hate our way too (#FBPlacesFail).

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Hide ya kids, Hide ya wife, and Hide ya husbands- ‘cause we got a lotta media sensations up in here.

August 13th, 2010

From Tilla Tequilla to Chocolate Rain, media born sensations seem to happen on a weekly basis. With 24 hour cable news cycles and the growing popularity of social media, a new genre of celebrity has been introduced into the mainstream. The phrase, “don’t taze me bro”, is now a household saying, while the natural phenomenom known as a ‘double rainbow’ almost guarantees a chuckle amongst a group of friends. PUBLIC explores the latest group of overnight celebrities.

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

For those of you who have been living under a rock and may not know who Antoine Dodson is- he is the charismatic gentleman who debuted in a local news report turned YouTube sensation turned popular auto-tune song.  Antoine’s colorful explanation as to what happened that one fateful day when his sister was attacked and almost raped has caught the attention of so many that Antoine now has his own song, T-shirt line and most recently- an online fund to “get out of the projects.”

In today’s “real-time” news society it’s not surprising at all that Antoine has become so popular.  The star of that local newscast that debuted in late July has now become a full-fledged media sensation.  Unfortunately for Antoine Dodson, his 15 minutes may be up, and he has Steven Slater to thank for that.

Steven Slater is the newest media sensation to hit the blogosphere, twitter-verse, and news-cycle.  Slater, as you may know, is the JetBlue flight attendant who gained attention after his dramatic exit from work this past Monday.  After a rude passenger allegedly verbally abused Slater and hit him in the head with the overhead compartment bin, the flight attendant dropped some F-bombs over the plane’s PA system, grabbed some beers and hit the emergency exit.

The story, which broke on Monday, has spread like wildfire- it’s been covered by every news outlet and of course the late night comics have weighed in on the fun as well.  Slater, like Dodson even now has his own T-shirt line and Facebook fan page.   Even before Dodson and Slater stole the scene, the media sensation known as “the Barefoot Bandit” had his very own Facebook fan club, media blitz and I’m sure some T-shirts were made at some point during his 15 minutes.

Fleeting media sensations aren’t anything new to our media obsessed culture, but my question is this: what really makes a media sensation?  In our ADD culture, we want and get everything immediately, then dispose it once we’re bored.  What did Antoine Dodson and Steven Slate have that gave them staying power?

If you ask me, I’d have to say it was their gregarious personalities- the fact that they were just being themselves, unrehearsed, and unhinged.   Our society loves those individuals who are a little different, a little out there, but mostly those are just being themselves.

This could possibly explain the phenomenon that is Jersey Shore, and the downfall of Jake Pavelka.  The former relished in their outlandish personalities and made no excuses for their honest behavior, while the latter became a calculated phony- we already HAVE actors Jake, we don’t need any more.

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

-Arielle

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

From the Streets to the Tweets

August 4th, 2010

On August 3rd, rapper Wale released his follow-up to his crtically acclaimed mixtape “The Mixtape About Nothing”. However, most didn’t anticipate how popular the actual release would be, and Twitter should take a significant amount of credit for More About Nothing’s release day success.

As an avid user of social media, I have never been one to have the ‘too cool for school’ attitude regarding social networking. However, as far as utilizing it as an avenue for direct marketing has always made sense to me, but personally I found such tactics painfully annoying–until yesterday.

Wale, a Washington DC native and ‘Twitter happy’ rapper, released a free album for his fans yesterday at noon. As a fan of Wale, I have been paying fairly close to attention to the process and was fascinated by the way in which he created buzz surrounding the album. Yesterday the DC emcee enjoyed more than 100,000 downloads via a single site, and even more via other sites. Although many others have been successful at utilizing social media as a marketing tool, this was the first time I was captivated by the entire process. Below is a timeline of events that led up the release of Wale’s mixtape, “More About Nothing”:

  • First, Wale mysteriously disappeared from the Twitter scene for weeks and came back to announce that he will being sharing his reasoning behind his disappearance to his followers in the upcoming days.
  • Days later Wale posts a link on his Twitter account to this youtube video: 

    The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

  • After being hammered with questions from fans awaiting the highly awaited sequel to his class mixtape ‘The Mixtape About Nothing’, he gets the nod from his label to release the single,“Black and Gold”.
  • A week or so later, Wale and Kid Cudi team up for a Heineken promotional show in Soho, New  York City.
  • Wale claimed he would be dropping the mixtape at noon on August 3rd, but before noon  “More About Nothing” was trending worldwide via Twitter, the hip hop community buzzed about the overdue return of DC’s most celebrated hip hop act.
  • The mixtape is released at noon via Twitter and a variety of music blogs. Many links experience problems as a result of the traffic.
  • Late yesterday afternoon “More About Nothing’ surpasses Christopher Nolan’s Inception on the worldwide twitter trending feed.

Social media has become a vehicle for getting the word out for anything. Wale had an established following prior to this sequence of events, but the way the buzz was generated through trending topics and timelines worldwide demonstrates how truly remarkable the social media world really is. Is the future of direct marketing already upon us?

-Aaron

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Great TV on ABC? Yeah right! This summer it’s more like Dumb TV on DumbBC!

July 1st, 2010

Great TV on ABC?  Yeah right!  This summer it’s more like Dumb TV on DumbBC!

Doing their part for Big Brother (the shadowy figure, not the reality show), ABC is keeping the workingman stupid and sated with a Tuesday lineup of  “http://abc.go.com/shows/wipeout” Wipeout and  “http://abc.go.com/shows/downfall” Downfall.

Wipeout is America’s un-hilarious version of Japan’s hilarious  “http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5214388990912034244″ Most Extreme Elimination Challenge”, mixed with Japan’s also-hilarious “  “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sasuke_%28TV_series%29″ Ninja Warrior”.  It’s not awful because someone always gets hit in the face with something, but other than pratfalls the show’s not really good for anything, and the hosts remind me of   “http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE13irgtCQw” Ryan Stile’s two irritating slacker brothers.  The real schlock, however, shows up next in the rotation in the form of Downfall.

In a callous display of wasteful decadence unseen in a failing empire since Caligula’s Rome, Downfall is the American game show equivalent of a   “http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2421/were-there-really-vomitoriums-in-ancient-rome” vomitorium.  Contestants perch on the top of a tall building and respond to clues about a specific topic, while in front of them on a conveyor belt are they prizes they seek to win.  As the clock winds down, they prizes creep toward the edge of the building, and are one by one jettisoned to their ruin until the contestant answers enough questions right.  Perfectly good electronics and automobiles, all smashed to pieces to the delighted squeals of audiences of post-Roman plebeians.

The host is a pretty good pick, in ex-WWE wrestler Chris Jericho.  At least he doesn’t come off too smart for the show; in the premier episode, he mispronounces the name of one of President Obama’s daughters.

Now, I’m not one to whom hatred of ABC comes as a knee jerk.  There was a time when I’d happily opt for a Friday in, catching   “http://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/about-the-show” Shark Tank (the BEST!), watching wives get swapped, and cheering for nannies to save the day.  Not that these programs are the brain-food of Nobel laureates, but come on people!  Throwing prospective prizes off a roof?  Jeez!

Ultimately, it’s always up to you, and though there’s nothing morally wrong with tuning in to ABC on Tuesdays this summer, to those who do I ask this:
1) Aren’t we, as a culture, just BEGGING for it?
2) Why don’t you turn the television off, and download a nice podcast?    “http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/” Radiolab and  “http://www.thisamericanlife.org/” This American Life aren’t inappropriately taxing on the ol’ noggin’, and I think you’ll find you feel better after being spoken to like a being capable of thought.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

The Cunning of a Tiger: M.I.A. Bites Back at Times Reporter via Twitter Terrorism Weeks Before New Album Drops

June 4th, 2010

The recent controversy over the NY Times article misquoting of rapper M.I.A., which then led to a cyber-scuffle where M.I.A. (Maya) tweeted the reporter’s phone number, pretending it was her own, has brought up some interesting questions.

The extensive article on M.I.A. sought to reveal the extreme contradictions that riddle the life of the rapper as she touts the political strife of her native Sri Lanka, yet lives a lavish life in the Hollywood hills. The quotation in question, a verbal mash up of the artist’s statements from different points in the interview, allege M.I.A’s reason for performing at the Grammy’s was to garner support for war in her home country.

This raises the question of journalistic integrity, when a reporter strings together a quote to support the overall theme of the article. This of course is professionally unethical, but it happens. When someone agrees to give an interview, being misstated or portrayed in an unfavorable light are potential risks.

And yes, social media like Twitter and Facebook, the mediums of which M.I.A. retaliated, have made reporters more vulnerable to retribution from disgruntled interviewees that can be detrimental to their professional reputation. But what I think is particularly intriguing about this situation is M.I.A’s ability to direct public attention to this controversy, and therefore to the 8000+ word article that details her life, career, national cause, and upcoming album release.

M.I.A. secretly (strategically?) recorded the interview, posted the real statements online and has already come out with a new song, lyrically criticizing the reporter; “Why the hell would journalists be thick as shit”. Perhaps, she was aware of the possibility of being misquoted and prepared to not only protect herself, but leverage it for self-promotion.

The success of M.I.A’s career can largely be attributed to her ability to instigate and harness divisive and controversial issues. Before M.I.A., many people did not know who the Tamil Tigers were, the country’s political situation, or even where Sri Lanka is. Her lyrics may not accurately convey the ins and outs of the unrest, but at least it has created awareness.

As for the artist herself, her notoriety that stems from incidences like these, has kept her current and provided her with an enviable lifestyle. Had she not made such a stink about the article, a kind of twitter terrorism by dropping the reporter’s digits, I wouldn’t have even heard about the article, let alone read it. Bravo, M.I.A.

Her new album, Maya, will be released July 13th.

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Facebook: Social Innovation Meets Social Destruction

May 25th, 2010

In his Washington Post op-ed, creator of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg said, “People want to share and stay connected with their friends and the people around them. If we give people control over what they share, they will want to share more. If people share more, the world will become more open and connected. And a world that’s more open and connected is a better world.”

I understand Zuckerberg’s desire to make the world an open and connected sphere, but there reaches a point when it all becomes just too much.

Lately- Zuckerberg has been going out on the defense in order to combat the negative press he has been receiving over Facebook’s privacy controls. One Facebook employee even leaked to a Time’s reporter that Zuckerberg “doesn’t believe” in online privacy.  Corroboration to support this belief came in the form of mounting difficulty for users to edit their own privacy settings on the site.

I’m not sure where to direct the blame but recently it seems that Facebook is everywhere.  Is it our own faults-has Facebook nourished our inherent desires to be noticed and recognized and thus made us all inclined to publicize every menial detail of our otherwise mundane lives?  Is it just that this whole privacy scandal has been all over the news-scoring two headlines in the Wall Street Journal, an op-ed in the Washington Post, an editorial in the Times, and gracing the cover of Time magazine all in the last week.  Or could advertisers be the ones to blame- digging their hands into social media to promote their own products.  Whatever the cause of Facebook’s overwhelming presence-the social networking site that boasts 400 million users has, in one way or another, taken over the world, and dare I say…our lives?

While issues of privacy and corporate greed are indeed, reasons to cause alarm, there is something that worries me even more about Facebook.  It seems that we have all become obsessed.   Whether you’re the passive voyeur or the constant status-updater, you know what is going on in the world of Facebook.  If you are online, you more than likely have a tab reserved for it.  Facebook has maneuvered its way into a position within our lives that is much more powerful and encompassing than we are willing to admit.

Whether its formulating status updates, uploading pictures, writing on friends’ walls – everything we do in real life has taken an additional step: The Facebook step.  The days are gone when we could just enjoy something in life for what it was.  Going to your best friend’s bachelorette party?  Well, better make sure your status is updated beforehand; notifying everyone in your social network of the fun adventure you are about to embark on.  You might also want to update your status several times during the actual event…just to make sure everyone knows how much you are enjoying yourself.  You can even compliment these status updates with a mobile upload. Why not?  I mean…it’s just so easy.  And then after it’s all said and done…Facebook is going to need proof of this occasion-in the form of a photo album.  It is also going to be essential that you relive the monumental occasion in the form of wall posts to and from others who participated in this exclusive experience.

We are all guilty of it- and some more than others, but all of this uploading and updating has got me thinking…Are we no longer satisfied with our lives unless proof of them is broadcasted on “the book?”  I know Zuckerberg wants an “open” world for us all to share- but at what cost?  When do our lives stop becoming ours and start becoming the ones we want everyone to think we are living?

-Arielle

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon